[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200715082733.429610-10-idosch@idosch.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:27:31 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, jiri@...lanox.com,
petrm@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 09/11] selftests: mlxsw: tc_restrictions: Test tc-police restrictions
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Test that upper and lower limits on rate and burst size imposed by the
device are rejected by the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>
---
.../drivers/net/mlxsw/tc_restrictions.sh | 76 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/tc_restrictions.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/tc_restrictions.sh
index 9241250c5921..553cb9fad508 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/tc_restrictions.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/tc_restrictions.sh
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ ALL_TESTS="
matchall_mirror_behind_flower_ingress_test
matchall_sample_behind_flower_ingress_test
matchall_mirror_behind_flower_egress_test
+ police_limits_test
+ multi_police_test
"
NUM_NETIFS=2
@@ -287,6 +289,80 @@ matchall_mirror_behind_flower_egress_test()
matchall_behind_flower_egress_test "mirror" "mirred egress mirror dev $swp2"
}
+police_limits_test()
+{
+ RET=0
+
+ tc qdisc add dev $swp1 clsact
+
+ tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip handle 101 \
+ flower skip_sw \
+ action police rate 0.5kbit burst 1m conform-exceed drop/ok
+ check_fail $? "Incorrect success to add police action with too low rate"
+
+ tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip handle 101 \
+ flower skip_sw \
+ action police rate 2.5tbit burst 1g conform-exceed drop/ok
+ check_fail $? "Incorrect success to add police action with too high rate"
+
+ tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip handle 101 \
+ flower skip_sw \
+ action police rate 1.5kbit burst 1m conform-exceed drop/ok
+ check_err $? "Failed to add police action with low rate"
+
+ tc filter del dev $swp1 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
+
+ tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip handle 101 \
+ flower skip_sw \
+ action police rate 1.9tbit burst 1g conform-exceed drop/ok
+ check_err $? "Failed to add police action with high rate"
+
+ tc filter del dev $swp1 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
+
+ tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip handle 101 \
+ flower skip_sw \
+ action police rate 1.5kbit burst 512b conform-exceed drop/ok
+ check_fail $? "Incorrect success to add police action with too low burst size"
+
+ tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip handle 101 \
+ flower skip_sw \
+ action police rate 1.5kbit burst 2k conform-exceed drop/ok
+ check_err $? "Failed to add police action with low burst size"
+
+ tc filter del dev $swp1 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
+
+ tc qdisc del dev $swp1 clsact
+
+ log_test "police rate and burst limits"
+}
+
+multi_police_test()
+{
+ RET=0
+
+ # It is forbidden in mlxsw driver to have multiple police
+ # actions in a single rule.
+
+ tc qdisc add dev $swp1 clsact
+
+ tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 \
+ flower skip_sw \
+ action police rate 100mbit burst 100k conform-exceed drop/ok
+ check_err $? "Failed to add rule with single police action"
+
+ tc filter del dev $swp1 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 flower
+
+ tc filter add dev $swp1 ingress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 \
+ flower skip_sw \
+ action police rate 100mbit burst 100k conform-exceed drop/pipe \
+ action police rate 200mbit burst 200k conform-exceed drop/ok
+ check_fail $? "Incorrect success to add rule with two police actions"
+
+ tc qdisc del dev $swp1 clsact
+
+ log_test "multi police"
+}
+
setup_prepare()
{
swp1=${NETIFS[p1]}
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists