netdev - 答复: [Intel-wired-lan] [bug ?] i40e_rx_buffer_flip should not be called for redirected xsk copy mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Jul 2020 05:33:31 +0000
From:   "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@...du.com>
To:     Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>
CC:     intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
        "Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: 答复: [Intel-wired-lan] [bug ?] i40e_rx_buffer_flip should not be called for redirected xsk copy mode

> > > >
> > > > Thank you RongQing for reporting this. I will take a look at it
> > > > and produce a patch.
> > > >
> > > > /Magnus
> > >
> >
> > Ping
> 
> My apologies RongQing, but it is taking longer than expected due to key people
> being on vacation during this summer period. We are debating weather the
> simple fix you provided covers all cases.
> Hopefully it does, but we just want to make sure. The fix is needed in four
> drivers: the ones you mention plus ice.
> 
> /Magnus

If my RFC patch is suitable for this bug, I will resend it.

should I send four patches for four drivers, or should I send one patch for them?


Thanks

-Li