netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 12/13] net: phylink: add struct phylink

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:26:00 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>,
        "michael@...le.cc" <michael@...le.cc>,
        "olteanv@...il.com" <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 12/13] net: phylink: add struct phylink_pcs

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:50:57PM +0000, Ioana Ciornei wrote:
> On 6/30/20 5:29 PM, Russell King wrote:
> > Add a way for MAC PCS to have private data while keeping independence
> > from struct phylink_config, which is used for the MAC itself. We need
> > this independence as we will have stand-alone code for PCS that is
> > independent of the MAC.  Introduce struct phylink_pcs, which is
> > designed to be embedded in a driver private data structure.
> > 
> > This structure does not include a mdio_device as there are PCS
> > implementations such as the Marvell DSA and network drivers where this
> > is not necessary.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
> 
> I integrated and used the phylink_pcs structure into the Lynx PCS just 
> to see how everything fits. Pasting below the main parts so that we can 
> catch early any possible different opinions on how to integrate this:
> 
> The basic Lynx structure looks like below and the main idea is just to 
> encapsulate the phylink_pcs structure and the mdio device (which in some 
> other cases might not be needed).
> 
> struct lynx_pcs {
>         struct phylink_pcs pcs;
>         struct mdio_device *mdio;
>         phy_interface_t interface;
> };
> 
> The lynx_pcs structure is requested by the MAC driver with:
> 
> struct lynx_pcs *lynx_pcs_create(struct mdio_device *mdio)
> {
> (...)
>         lynx_pcs->mdio = mdio;
>         lynx_pcs->pcs.ops = &lynx_pcs_phylink_ops;
>         lynx_pcs->pcs.poll = true;
> 
>         return lynx_pcs;
> }
> 
> And then passed to phylink with something like:
> 
> phylink_set_pcs(pl, &lynx_pcs->pcs);
> 
> 
> For DSA it's a bit less straightforward because the .setup() callback 
> from the dsa_switch_ops is run before any phylink structure has been 
> created internally. For this, a new DSA helper can be created that just 
> stores the phylink_pcs structure per port:
> 
> void dsa_port_phylink_set_pcs(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>                               struct phylink_pcs *pcs)
> {
>         struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_to_port(ds, port);
> 
>         dp->pcs = pcs;                                         but I do
> }
> 
> and at the appropriate time, from dsa_slave_setup, it can really install 
> the phylink_pcs with phylink_set_pcs.
> The other option would be to add a new dsa_switch ops that requests the 
> phylink_pcs for a specific port - something like phylink_get_pcs.

It is entirely possible to set the PCS in the mac_prepare() or
mac_config() callbacks - but DSA doesn't yet support the mac_prepare()
callback (because it needs to be propagated through the DSA way of
doing things.)

An example of this can be found at:

http://git.armlinux.org.uk/cgit/linux-arm.git/commit/?h=mcbin&id=593d56ef8c7f7d395626752f6810210471a5f5c1

where we choose between the XLGMAC and GMAC pcs_ops structures
depending on the interface mode we are configuring for.  Note that
this is one of the devices that the PCS does not appear as a
distinctly separate entity in the register set, at least in the
GMAC side of things.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!