[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200720163748.GA1292162@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:37:48 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, dccp@...r.kernel.org,
linux-decnet-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
mptcp@...ts.01.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
rds-devel@....oracle.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-x25@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/24] net: add a new sockptr_t type
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 02:47:16PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Add a uptr_t type that can hold a pointer to either a user or kernel
> memory region, and simply helpers to copy to and from it. For
> architectures like x86 that have non-overlapping user and kernel
> address space it just is a union and uses a TASK_SIZE check to
> select the proper copy routine. For architectures with overlapping
> address spaces a flag to indicate the address space is used instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
> include/linux/sockptr.h | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 121 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/sockptr.h
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sockptr.h b/include/linux/sockptr.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000000..e41dfa52555dec
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/sockptr.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Christoph Hellwig.
> + *
> + * Support for "universal" pointers that can point to either kernel or userspace
> + * memory.
> + */
> +#ifndef _LINUX_SOCKPTR_H
> +#define _LINUX_SOCKPTR_H
> +
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE
> +typedef union {
> + void *kernel;
> + void __user *user;
> +} sockptr_t;
> +
> +static inline bool sockptr_is_kernel(sockptr_t sockptr)
> +{
> + return (unsigned long)sockptr.kernel >= TASK_SIZE;
> +}
> +
> +static inline sockptr_t KERNEL_SOCKPTR(void *p)
> +{
> + return (sockptr_t) { .kernel = p };
> +}
> +#else /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE */
> +typedef struct {
> + union {
> + void *kernel;
> + void __user *user;
> + };
> + bool is_kernel : 1;
> +} sockptr_t;
> +
> +static inline bool sockptr_is_kernel(sockptr_t sockptr)
> +{
> + return sockptr.is_kernel;
> +}
> +
> +static inline sockptr_t KERNEL_SOCKPTR(void *p)
> +{
> + return (sockptr_t) { .kernel = p, .is_kernel = true };
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE */
> +
> +static inline sockptr_t USER_SOCKPTR(void __user *p)
> +{
> + return (sockptr_t) { .user = p };
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool sockptr_is_null(sockptr_t sockptr)
> +{
> + return !sockptr.user && !sockptr.kernel;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int copy_from_sockptr(void *dst, sockptr_t src, size_t size)
> +{
> + if (!sockptr_is_kernel(src))
> + return copy_from_user(dst, src.user, size);
> + memcpy(dst, src.kernel, size);
> + return 0;
> +}
How does this not introduce a massive security hole when
CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE?
AFAICS, userspace can pass in a pointer >= TASK_SIZE,
and this code makes it be treated as a kernel pointer.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists