lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 22:43:53 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@...enta.de>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
        Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: dsa: microchip: call phy_remove_link_mode during
 probe

Ignoring the part about how to cleanup this internal phydev for the
moment.

>  int ksz9477_switch_register(struct ksz_device *dev)
>  {
> -	return ksz_switch_register(dev, &ksz9477_dev_ops);
> +	int ret, i;
> +	struct phy_device *phydev;
> +
> +	ret = ksz_switch_register(dev, &ksz9477_dev_ops);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < dev->phy_port_cnt; ++i) {
> +		phydev = dsa_to_port(dev->ds, i)->slave->phydev;

There is no guarantee this phydev actually exists, as far as i
remember. It will only be allocated for user ports. If a port is not
used, i.e. not listed in DT, it won't have a phydev. So you should add
a test:

		if (!dsa_is_user(ds, i))
			continue;

Otherwise, this now seems correct.

Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists