netdev - Re: [PATCH V2 2/6] kvm: detect assigned device via irqbypass manager

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c46dc561-610e-e992-8bb9-e7286a560971@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jul 2020 12:19:37 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
Cc:     mst@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/6] kvm: detect assigned device via irqbypass manager


On 2020/7/18 上午2:08, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 19:23:45 +0800
> Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> vDPA devices has dedicated backed hardware like
>> passthrough-ed devices. Then it is possible to setup irq
>> offloading to vCPU for vDPA devices. Thus this patch tries to
>> manipulated assigned device counters via irqbypass manager.
>>
>> We will increase/decrease the assigned device counter in kvm/x86.
>> Both vDPA and VFIO would go through this code path.
>>
>> This code path only affect x86 for now.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
>> Suggested-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 10 ++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 00c88c2..20c07d3 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -10624,11 +10624,17 @@ int kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
>>   {
>>   	struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
>>   		container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
>> +	int ret;
>>   
>>   	irqfd->producer = prod;
>> +	kvm_arch_start_assignment(irqfd->kvm);
>> +	ret = kvm_x86_ops.update_pi_irte(irqfd->kvm,
>> +					 prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, 1);
>> +
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		kvm_arch_end_assignment(irqfd->kvm);
>>   
>> -	return kvm_x86_ops.update_pi_irte(irqfd->kvm,
>> -					   prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, 1);
>> +	return ret;
>>   }
>>   
>>   void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
>
> Why isn't there a matching end-assignment in the del_producer path?  It
> seems this only goes one-way, what happens when a device is
> hot-unplugged from the VM or the device interrupt configuration changes.
> This will still break vfio if it's not guaranteed to be symmetric.
> Thanks,
>
> Alex


Yes, we need add logic in the del_producer path.

Thanks