| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 19:52:37 -0700
From: Luke Nelson <lukenels@...washington.edu>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>,
Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/3] bpf, riscv: Add compressed instructions to rv64 JIT
This patch series enables using compressed riscv (RVC) instructions
in the rv64 BPF JIT.
RVC is a standard riscv extension that adds a set of compressed,
2-byte instructions that can replace some regular 4-byte instructions
for improved code density.
This series first modifies the JIT to support using 2-byte instructions
(e.g., in jump offset computations), then adds RVC encoding and
helper functions, and finally uses the helper functions to optimize
the rv64 JIT.
I used our formal verification framework, Serval, to verify the
correctness of the RVC encodings and their uses in the rv64 JIT.
The JIT continues to pass all tests in lib/test_bpf.c, and introduces
no new failures to test_verifier; both with and without RVC being enabled.
The following are examples of the JITed code for the verifier selftest
"direct packet read test#3 for CGROUP_SKB OK", without and with RVC
enabled, respectively. The former uses 178 bytes, and the latter uses 112,
for a ~37% reduction in code size for this example.
Without RVC:
0: 02000813 addi a6,zero,32
4: fd010113 addi sp,sp,-48
8: 02813423 sd s0,40(sp)
c: 02913023 sd s1,32(sp)
10: 01213c23 sd s2,24(sp)
14: 01313823 sd s3,16(sp)
18: 01413423 sd s4,8(sp)
1c: 03010413 addi s0,sp,48
20: 03056683 lwu a3,48(a0)
24: 02069693 slli a3,a3,0x20
28: 0206d693 srli a3,a3,0x20
2c: 03456703 lwu a4,52(a0)
30: 02071713 slli a4,a4,0x20
34: 02075713 srli a4,a4,0x20
38: 03856483 lwu s1,56(a0)
3c: 02049493 slli s1,s1,0x20
40: 0204d493 srli s1,s1,0x20
44: 03c56903 lwu s2,60(a0)
48: 02091913 slli s2,s2,0x20
4c: 02095913 srli s2,s2,0x20
50: 04056983 lwu s3,64(a0)
54: 02099993 slli s3,s3,0x20
58: 0209d993 srli s3,s3,0x20
5c: 09056a03 lwu s4,144(a0)
60: 020a1a13 slli s4,s4,0x20
64: 020a5a13 srli s4,s4,0x20
68: 00900313 addi t1,zero,9
6c: 006a7463 bgeu s4,t1,0x74
70: 00000a13 addi s4,zero,0
74: 02d52823 sw a3,48(a0)
78: 02e52a23 sw a4,52(a0)
7c: 02952c23 sw s1,56(a0)
80: 03252e23 sw s2,60(a0)
84: 05352023 sw s3,64(a0)
88: 00000793 addi a5,zero,0
8c: 02813403 ld s0,40(sp)
90: 02013483 ld s1,32(sp)
94: 01813903 ld s2,24(sp)
98: 01013983 ld s3,16(sp)
9c: 00813a03 ld s4,8(sp)
a0: 03010113 addi sp,sp,48
a4: 00078513 addi a0,a5,0
a8: 00008067 jalr zero,0(ra)
With RVC:
0: 02000813 addi a6,zero,32
4: 7179 c.addi16sp sp,-48
6: f422 c.sdsp s0,40(sp)
8: f026 c.sdsp s1,32(sp)
a: ec4a c.sdsp s2,24(sp)
c: e84e c.sdsp s3,16(sp)
e: e452 c.sdsp s4,8(sp)
10: 1800 c.addi4spn s0,sp,48
12: 03056683 lwu a3,48(a0)
16: 1682 c.slli a3,0x20
18: 9281 c.srli a3,0x20
1a: 03456703 lwu a4,52(a0)
1e: 1702 c.slli a4,0x20
20: 9301 c.srli a4,0x20
22: 03856483 lwu s1,56(a0)
26: 1482 c.slli s1,0x20
28: 9081 c.srli s1,0x20
2a: 03c56903 lwu s2,60(a0)
2e: 1902 c.slli s2,0x20
30: 02095913 srli s2,s2,0x20
34: 04056983 lwu s3,64(a0)
38: 1982 c.slli s3,0x20
3a: 0209d993 srli s3,s3,0x20
3e: 09056a03 lwu s4,144(a0)
42: 1a02 c.slli s4,0x20
44: 020a5a13 srli s4,s4,0x20
48: 4325 c.li t1,9
4a: 006a7363 bgeu s4,t1,0x50
4e: 4a01 c.li s4,0
50: d914 c.sw a3,48(a0)
52: d958 c.sw a4,52(a0)
54: dd04 c.sw s1,56(a0)
56: 03252e23 sw s2,60(a0)
5a: 05352023 sw s3,64(a0)
5e: 4781 c.li a5,0
60: 7422 c.ldsp s0,40(sp)
62: 7482 c.ldsp s1,32(sp)
64: 6962 c.ldsp s2,24(sp)
66: 69c2 c.ldsp s3,16(sp)
68: 6a22 c.ldsp s4,8(sp)
6a: 6145 c.addi16sp sp,48
6c: 853e c.mv a0,a5
6e: 8082 c.jr ra
RFC -> v1:
- From Björn Töpel:
* Changed RVOFF macro to static inline "ninsns_rvoff".
* Changed return type of rvc_ functions from u32 to u16.
* Changed sizeof(u16) to sizeof(*ctx->insns).
* Factored unsigned immediate checks into helper functions
(is_8b_uint, etc.)
* Changed to use IS_ENABLED instead of #ifdef to check if RVC is
enabled.
* Changed type of immediate arguments to rvc_* encoding to u32
to avoid issues from promotion of u16 to signed int.
* Cleaned up RVC checks in emit_{addi,slli,srli,srai}.
+ Wrapped lines at 100 instead of 80 columns for increased clarity.
+ Move !imm checks into each branch instead of checking
separately.
+ Strengthed checks for c.{slli,srli,srai} to check that
imm < XLEN. Otherwise, imm could be non-zero but the lower
XLEN bits could all be zero, leading to invalid RVC encoding.
* Changed emit_imm to sign-extend the 12-bit value in "lower"
+ The immediate checks for emit_{addiw,li,addi} use signed
comparisons, so this enables the RVC variants to be used
more often (e.g., if val == -1, then lower should be -1
as opposed to 4095).
Luke Nelson (3):
bpf, riscv: Modify JIT ctx to support compressed instructions
bpf, riscv: Add encodings for compressed instructions
bpf, riscv: Use compressed instructions in the rv64 JIT
arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h | 483 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 14 +-
arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 293 ++++++++++---------
arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_core.c | 6 +-
4 files changed, 643 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists