[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b0242ee8-b5ca-3e89-a7ff-c1f11a0b432a@isovalent.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:52:17 +0100
From: Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
To: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4] bpftool: use only nftw for file tree parsing
On 21/07/2020 03:48, Tony Ambardar wrote:
> The bpftool sources include code to walk file trees, but use multiple
> frameworks to do so: nftw and fts. While nftw conforms to POSIX/SUSv3 and
> is widely available, fts is not conformant and less common, especially on
> non-glibc systems. The inconsistent framework usage hampers maintenance
> and portability of bpftool, in particular for embedded systems.
>
> Standardize code usage by rewriting one fts-based function to use nftw and
> clean up some related function warnings by extending use of "const char *"
> arguments. This change helps in building bpftool against musl for OpenWrt.
>
> Also fix an unsafe call to dirname() by duplicating the string to pass,
> since some implementations may directly alter it. The same approach is
> used in libbpf.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <Tony.Ambardar@...il.com>
All good for me this time, thank you!
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists