lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 13:59:38 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Tom Parkin <tparkin@...alix.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/29] l2tp: cleanup difficult-to-read line breaks

On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:31:57 +0100 Tom Parkin wrote:
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> -		if (info->attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_SADDR] &&
> -		    info->attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_DADDR]) {
> -			cfg.local_ip6 = nla_data(
> -				info->attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_SADDR]);
> -			cfg.peer_ip6 = nla_data(
> -				info->attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_DADDR]);
> -		} else
> +		if (attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_SADDR] && attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_DADDR]) {
> +			cfg.local_ip6 = nla_data(attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_SADDR]);
> +			cfg.peer_ip6 = nla_data(attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_DADDR]);
> +		} else {
>  #endif

This no longer builds. Probably because you added the closing backet
which wasn't there?

Please make sure each patch in the submission builds cleanly.

Please split this submission into series of at most 15 patches at a
time, to make sure reviewers don't get overloaded.

Please CC people who are working on the l2tp code (get_maintainers
script is your friend).

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ