netdev - RE: [PATCH v2 net] ieee802154: fix one possible memleak in adf7242

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F88C5DDA1E80143B232E89585ACE27D129AA062@dggemm508-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 01:33:31 +0000
From:   "liujian (CE)" <liujian56@...wei.com>
To:     Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>,
        "michael.hennerich@...log.com" <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
        "alex.aring@...il.com" <alex.aring@...il.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "kjlu@....edu" <kjlu@....edu>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 net] ieee802154: fix one possible memleak in
 adf7242_probe



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Schmidt [mailto:stefan@...enfreihafen.org]
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 10:16 PM
> To: liujian (CE) <liujian56@...wei.com>; michael.hennerich@...log.com;
> alex.aring@...il.com; davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org;
> kjlu@....edu; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] ieee802154: fix one possible memleak in
> adf7242_probe
> 
> Hello.
> 
> On 20.07.20 16:30, Liu Jian wrote:
> > When probe fail, we should destroy the workqueue.
> >
> > Fixes: 2795e8c25161 ("net: ieee802154: fix a potential NULL pointer
> > dereference")
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
> > ---
> > v1->v2:
> > Change targeting from "net-next" to "net"
> 
> 
> Before sending a second version make sure you check replies to your patch
> postings. I already applied the v1 patch to my wpan tree which goes into net.
I am sorry for this, I will check the mail first hereafter.
> As v2 it is identical v1 therei s nothing to do here for me.
> 
> regards
> Stefan Schmidt