lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:25:53 -0700 From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> Cc: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, sorganov@...il.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] docs: networking: timestamping: add a set of frequently asked questions On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:51:27PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > So I think the position of "just don't have software timestamping code > in DSA and you'll be fine" won't be getting us anywhere. Either you can > or you can't, and there isn't anything absurd about it, so sooner or > later somebody will want to do it. The rules surrounding it, however, > are far from being ready, or clear. > > Am I missing something? I'm just trying to make things easy for you, as the author of DSA drivers. There is no need to set skb flags that have no purpose within the stack. Nobody is demanding software time stamps from any DSA devices yet, and so I don't see the point in solving a problem that doesn't exist. I'm sorry if the "rules" are not clear, but if you look around the kernel internals, you will be hard pressed to find perfectly documented rules anywhere! Thanks, Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists