netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 01/15] qed: reformat "qed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200722223311.GK25301@ziepe.ca>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:33:11 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...vell.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>,
        Michal Kalderon <michal.kalderon@...vell.com>,
        Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
        Denis Bolotin <denis.bolotin@...vell.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        GR-everest-linux-l2@...vell.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 01/15] qed: reformat "qed_chain.h" a bit

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 01:10:31AM +0300, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Reformat structs and macros definitions a bit prior to making functional
> changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kalderon <michal.kalderon@...vell.com>
>  include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h | 126 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h b/include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h
> index 7071dc92b4e2..087073517c09 100644
> +++ b/include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h
> @@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ enum qed_chain_mode {
>  };
>  
>  enum qed_chain_use_mode {
> -	QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_PRODUCE,		/* Chain starts empty */
> -	QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME,		/* Chain starts full */
> -	QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME_PRODUCE,	/* Chain starts empty */
> +	QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_PRODUCE,			/* Chain starts empty */
> +	QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME,			/* Chain starts full */
> +	QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME_PRODUCE,		/* Chain starts empty */
>  };
>  
>  enum qed_chain_cnt_type {
> @@ -40,84 +40,86 @@ enum qed_chain_cnt_type {
>  };
>  
>  struct qed_chain_next {
> -	struct regpair	next_phys;
> -	void		*next_virt;
> +	struct regpair					next_phys;
> +	void						*next_virt;
>  };

I'm surprised this is considered an improvement??

I've been encouring people to go the other way, maintaining vertical alignment is
harmful to backporting..

Jason