[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200722090617.GA4419@katalix.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:06:18 +0100
From: Tom Parkin <tparkin@...alix.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/29] l2tp: cleanup difficult-to-read line breaks
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 13:59:38 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:31:57 +0100 Tom Parkin wrote:
> > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> > - if (info->attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_SADDR] &&
> > - info->attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_DADDR]) {
> > - cfg.local_ip6 = nla_data(
> > - info->attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_SADDR]);
> > - cfg.peer_ip6 = nla_data(
> > - info->attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_DADDR]);
> > - } else
> > + if (attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_SADDR] && attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_DADDR]) {
> > + cfg.local_ip6 = nla_data(attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_SADDR]);
> > + cfg.peer_ip6 = nla_data(attrs[L2TP_ATTR_IP6_DADDR]);
> > + } else {
> > #endif
>
> This no longer builds. Probably because you added the closing backet
> which wasn't there?
>
> Please make sure each patch in the submission builds cleanly.
Sorry, this is a rebase snafu; my mistake. I test-built the complete
patch series of course, but I'll test build each in turn for v2.
> Please split this submission into series of at most 15 patches at a
> time, to make sure reviewers don't get overloaded.
Will do.
> Please CC people who are working on the l2tp code (get_maintainers
> script is your friend).
Ack, thanks.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists