netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200723121112.5f15950a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:11:12 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>,
        Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the net tree

Hi all,

On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:21:43 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   net/ipv4/udp.c
>   net/ipv6/udp.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   efc6b6f6c311 ("udp: Improve load balancing for SO_REUSEPORT.")
> 
> from the net tree and commits:
> 
>   7629c73a1466 ("udp: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group")
>   2a08748cd384 ("udp6: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group")
> 
> from the bpf-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I wasn't sure how to proceed, so I used the latter
> version) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far
> as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be
> mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

This is now a conflict between the net-next and net trees.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped