[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+ni+n-1T2Ls-cLx7Hj20PVSAWF754x4VzwoWcW8nxZ5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 22:15:11 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>
Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...udflare.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Fix BPF socket lookup with reuseport groups
with connections
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:59 AM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp> wrote:
>
> From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:17:18 +0200
> > This mini series contains a fix for a bug noticed when analyzing a reported
> > merge conflict between bpf-next and net tree [0].
> >
> > Apart from fixing a corner-case that affects use of BPF sk_lookup in tandem
> > with UDP reuseport groups with connected sockets, it should make the
> > conflict resolution with net tree easier.
> >
> > These changes don't replicate the improved UDP socket lookup behavior from
> > net tree, where commit efc6b6f6c311 ("udp: Improve load balancing for
> > SO_REUSEPORT.") is present.
> >
> > Happy to do it as a follow up. For the moment I didn't want to make things
> > more confusing when it comes to what got fixed where and why.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -jkbs
>
> Acked-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>
Applied to bpf-next. Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists