lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 23:12:15 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>, Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>, Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Jon <jon@...id-run.com>, Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>, Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>, Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux.cj@...il.com, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v7 1/6] Documentation: ACPI: DSD: Document MDIO PHY On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:20 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote: > I think we need to NACK all attempts to add ACPI support to phylib and > phylink until an authoritative ACPI Linux maintainer makes an > appearance and actively steers the work. And not just this patchset, > but all patchsets in the networking domain which have an ACPI > component. It's funny, since I see ACPI mailing list and none of the maintainers in the Cc here... I'm not sure they pay attention to some (noise-like?) activity which (from their perspective) happens on unrelated lists. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists