netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v7 1/6] Documentation: ACPI: DSD: Document MDIO PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 22:06:41 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
        Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>,
        Jon <jon@...id-run.com>,
        Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux.cj@...il.com,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v7 1/6] Documentation: ACPI: DSD: Document MDIO
 PHY

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:12:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:20 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> 
> > I think we need to NACK all attempts to add ACPI support to phylib and
> > phylink until an authoritative ACPI Linux maintainer makes an
> > appearance and actively steers the work. And not just this patchset,
> > but all patchsets in the networking domain which have an ACPI
> > component.
> 
> It's funny, since I see ACPI mailing list and none of the maintainers
> in the Cc here...
> I'm not sure they pay attention to some (noise-like?) activity which
> (from their perspective) happens on unrelated lists.

That is really disappointing that these patch sets are not being copied
to the appropriate people (ACPI).

I seem to remember I've already stated on at least a couple of
occasions that these patch sets which add ACPI support to phylib need
to be copied to ACPI people.  I guess if ACPI people have been omitted,
there will be a few more patch series iterations.  Then there's that
all the discussion that has already happened is not known to ACPI
people, so we're probably doomed to repeating at least some of that.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!