[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200724.164847.1111562996497649259.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: kuniyu@...zon.co.jp
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, jakub@...udflare.com,
kuba@...nel.org, kuni1840@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
willemb@...gle.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] udp: Remove an unnecessary variable in
udp[46]_lib_lookup2().
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:13:04 +0900
> Yes. I think this kind of patch should be submitted to net-next, but
> this is for the net tree. Please let me add more description.
This does not fix a bug, therefore 'net' is not appropriate.
The merge conflicts should be handled by the appropriate maintainer
when the merges happen.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists