netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC leds + net-next v2 1/1] net: phy: marvell: add support for PHY LEDs via LED class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 25 Jul 2020 11:41:39 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        jacek.anaszewski@...il.com, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Ondřej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC leds + net-next v2 1/1] net: phy: marvell: add
 support for PHY LEDs via LED class

Hi!

> > > My main issue though is whether one "hw-control" trigger should be
> > > registered via LED API and the specific mode should be chosen via
> > > another sysfs file as in this RFC, or whether each HW control mode
> > > should have its own trigger. The second solution would either result in
> > > a lot of registered triggers or complicate LED API, though...
> > 
> > If you register say 5 triggers.... that's okay. If you do like 1024
> > additional triggers (it happened before!)... well please don't.
> 
> Hi Pavel
> 
> There tends to be around 15 different blink patterns per LED. And
> there can be 2 to 3 LEDs per PHY. The blink patterns can be different
> per PHY, or they can be the same. For the Marvell PHY we are looking
> at around 45. Most of the others PHYs tend to have the same patterns
> for all LEDs, so 15 triggers could be shared.
> 
> But if you then think of a 10 port Ethernet switch, there could be 450
> triggers, if the triggers are not shared at all.
> 
> So to some extent, it is a question of how much effort should be put
> in to sharing triggers.

It sounds to me ... lot of effort should be put to sharing triggers
there :-).

Best regards,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)