lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 13:48:16 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> To: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>, Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Jon <jon@...id-run.com>, Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>, Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>, Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux.cj@...il.com, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, Paul Yang <Paul.Yang@....com> Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v7 1/6] Documentation: ACPI: DSD: Document MDIO PHY On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:37 AM Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:20:04PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:13 PM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote: > > > On 7/24/20 1:12 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:20 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote: ... > > > >> I think we need to NACK all attempts to add ACPI support to phylib and > > > >> phylink until an authoritative ACPI Linux maintainer makes an > > > >> appearance and actively steers the work. And not just this patchset, > > > >> but all patchsets in the networking domain which have an ACPI > > > >> component. > > > > > > > > It's funny, since I see ACPI mailing list and none of the maintainers > > > > in the Cc here... > > > > I'm not sure they pay attention to some (noise-like?) activity which > > > > (from their perspective) happens on unrelated lists. > > > > > > If you what you describe here is their perception of what is going on > > > here, that is very encouraging, we are definitively going to make progress. > > > > I can't speak for them. As a maintainer in other areas I expect that > > people Cc explicitly maintainer(s) if they want more attention. > > Otherwise I look at the mails to the mailing list just from time to > > time. But this is my expectation, don't take me wrong. > > Sorry about this miss. > In some past patch-set, I had added Rafael but somehow missed him this time. > > From the "MAINTAINERS" file, I got two maintainers. I don't know who else > can help with this discussion. I'll add others whom I know from ACPI list. > M: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> > M: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> > > If you know others who can help, please add. > > Hi ACPI experts, > Would you please help review this patchset and guide us. > > Please see the discussion on this patchset here: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20200715090400.4733-1-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com/T/#t I would recommend resending the entire series with an appropriate Cc list. See below as well. ACPI FOR ARM64 (ACPI/arm64) M: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> M: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com> M: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists