[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200726182453.GA1996@kunai>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 20:24:53 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>,
Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] iwlwifi: yoyo: don't print failure if debug firmware
is missing
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 09:11:25PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 06:52:10PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >> Missing this firmware is not fatal, my wifi card still works. Even more,
> >> I couldn't find any documentation what it is or where to get it. So, I
> >> don't think the users should be notified if it is missing. If you browse
> >> the net, you see the message is present is in quite some logs. Better
> >> remove it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
> >> ---
> >
> > Any input on this? Or people I should add to CC?
>
> This was discussed on another thread:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87mu3magfp.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net
>
> Unless Intel folks object I'm planning to take this to
> wireless-drivers-next.
Cool, thanks for the heads up!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists