netdev - Re: [PATCH net V2] Crypto/chcr: Registering cxgb4 to xfrmdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200727091627.GX20687@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 11:16:27 +0200
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <ayush.sawal@...lsio.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <secdev@...lsio.com>, <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V2] Crypto/chcr: Registering cxgb4 to xfrmdev_ops

On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 04:20:34PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 05:01:08PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > 
> > Please start submitting chcr patches to the crypto subsystem, where it
> > belongs, instead of the networking GIT trees.
> 
> Hi Dave:
> 
> I think this patch belongs to the networking tree.  The reason is
> that it's related to xfrm offload which has nothing to do with the
> Crypto API.

Hm, I think some of this code is just misplaced under drivers/crypto.
All functions in 'drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ipsec.c' implement
networking (IPsec). So it should be under drivers/net, then it
can be merged via the net or net-next tree as usual for network
drivers.

> Do xfrm offload drivers usually go through the networking tree or
> would it be better directed through the xfrm tree?

The drivers go through the networking trees, and I think it should
stay like this. Otherwise we would create needless merge conflicts.