[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <882cd37d-0af2-3412-6bd7-73aa466df23c@iogearbox.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:43:52 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] bpf: fix swapped arguments in calls to
check_buffer_access
On 7/27/20 11:39 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:
> On 7/27/20 10:54 AM, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>
>> There are a couple of arguments of the boolean flag zero_size_allowed
>> and the char pointer buf_info when calling to function check_buffer_access
>> that are swapped by mistake. Fix these by swapping them to correct
>> the argument ordering.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Array compared to 0")
>> Fixes: afbf21dce668 ("bpf: Support readonly/readwrite buffers in verifier")
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Thanks for the fix!
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Sigh, thanks for the fix Colin, applied! Yonghong, could you follow-up with
BPF selftest test cases that exercise these paths? Thx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists