netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200728160802.GI1705504@lunn.ch>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:08:02 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy

> I think that the MAINTAINERS file should also be updated to mention the new
> path to the drivers. Just did a quick grep after 'drivers/net/phy':
> F:      drivers/net/phy/adin.c      
> F:      drivers/net/phy/mdio-xgene.c
> F:      drivers/net/phy/            
> F:      drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c
> F:      drivers/net/phy/mdio-mvusb.c
> F:      drivers/net/phy/dp83640*    
> F:      drivers/net/phy/phylink.c   
> F:      drivers/net/phy/sfp*        
> F:      drivers/net/phy/mdio-xpcs.c

Hi Ioana

Thanks, I will take care of that.

> Other than that, the new 'drivers/net/phy/phy/' path is somewhat repetitive but
> unfortunately I do not have another better suggestion.

Me neither.

I wonder if we are looking at the wrong part of the patch.
drivers/net/X/phy/
drivers/net/X/mdio/
drivers/net/X/pcs/

Question is, what would X be?

   Andrew