netdev - Re: iproute2 DDMMYY versioning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200728125136.6c5b46e8@hermes.lan>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:51:36 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iproute2 DDMMYY versioning - why?

On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:05:50 +0300
Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com> wrote:

> Stephen,
> 
> Taking into account that iproute releases are aligned with the kernel
> ones -- is there any real reason for the confusing DDMMYY double
> versioning?
> 
> I see that even the git tags go after the kernel releases..
> 
> Or.
> 

It is only an historical leftover, because 15 yrs ago that is how Alexy did it