netdev - Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 07/13] bpf: Add btf_struct_ids

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:35:16 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Wenbo Zhang <ethercflow@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Brendan Gregg <bgregg@...flix.com>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 07/13] bpf: Add btf_struct_ids_match function

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:13 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Adding btf_struct_ids_match function to check if given address provided
> by BTF object + offset is also address of another nested BTF object.
>
> This allows to pass an argument to helper, which is defined via parent
> BTF object + offset, like for bpf_d_path (added in following changes):
>
>   SEC("fentry/filp_close")
>   int BPF_PROG(prog_close, struct file *file, void *id)
>   {
>     ...
>     ret = bpf_d_path(&file->f_path, ...
>
> The first bpf_d_path argument is hold by verifier as BTF file object
> plus offset of f_path member.
>
> The btf_struct_ids_match function will walk the struct file object and
> check if there's nested struct path object on the given offset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h   |  2 ++
>  kernel/bpf/btf.c      | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>  3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index bae557ff2da8..c981e258fed3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1306,6 +1306,8 @@ int btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
>                       const struct btf_type *t, int off, int size,
>                       enum bpf_access_type atype,
>                       u32 *next_btf_id);
> +bool btf_struct_ids_match(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
> +                         int off, u32 id, u32 mid);
>  int btf_resolve_helper_id(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
>                           const struct bpf_func_proto *fn, int);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index 1ab5fd5bf992..562d4453fad3 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -4140,6 +4140,35 @@ int btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
>         return -EINVAL;
>  }
>
> +bool btf_struct_ids_match(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
> +                         int off, u32 id, u32 mid)
> +{
> +       const struct btf_type *type;
> +       u32 nid;
> +       int err;
> +

mid and nid are terrible names, especially as an input argument name.
mid == need_type_id? nid == cur_type_id or something along those
lines?

> +       do {
> +               type = btf_type_by_id(btf_vmlinux, id);
> +               if (!type)
> +                       return false;
> +               err = btf_struct_walk(log, type, off, 1, &nid);
> +               if (err < 0)
> +                       return false;
> +
> +               /* We found nested struct object. If it matches
> +                * the requested ID, we're done. Otherwise let's
> +                * continue the search with offset 0 in the new
> +                * type.
> +                */
> +               if (err == walk_struct && mid == nid)
> +                       return true;
> +               off = 0;
> +               id = nid;
> +       } while (err == walk_struct);

This seems like a slightly more obvious control flow:

again:

   ...

   if (err != walk_struct)
      return false;

   if (mid != nid) {
      off = 0;
      id = nid;
      goto again;
   }

   return true;

> +
> +       return false;
> +}
> +
>  int btf_resolve_helper_id(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
>                           const struct bpf_func_proto *fn, int arg)
>  {

[...]