netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 02/13] devlink: Add reload levels data to dev get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:37:41 +0300
From:   Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 02/13] devlink: Add reload levels data to dev
 get


On 7/28/2020 3:58 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:02:22 +0300 Moshe Shemesh wrote:
>> Expose devlink reload supported levels and driver's default level to the
>> user through devlink dev get command.
>>
>> Examples:
>> $ devlink dev show
>> pci/0000:82:00.0:
>>    reload_levels_info:
>>      default_level driver
>>      supported_levels:
>>        driver fw_reset fw_live_patch
>> pci/0000:82:00.1:
>>    reload_levels_info:
>>      default_level driver
>>      supported_levels:
>>        driver fw_reset fw_live_patch
>>
>> $ devlink dev show -jp
>> {
>>      "dev": {
>>          "pci/0000:82:00.0": {
>>              "reload_levels_info": {
>>                  "default_level": "driver",
>>                  "supported_levels": [ "driver","fw_reset","fw_live_patch" ]
>>              }
>>          },
>>          "pci/0000:82:00.1": {
>>              "reload_levels_info": {
>>                  "default_level": "driver",
>>                  "supported_levels": [ "driver","fw_reset","fw_live_patch" ]
>>              }
>>          }
>>      }
>> }
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>
> The fact that the driver supports fw_live_patch, does not necessarily
> mean that the currently running FW can be live upgraded to the
> currently flashed one, right?


That's correct, though the feature is supported, the firmware gap may 
not be suitable for live_patch.

The user will be noted accordingly by extack message.

>
> This interface does not appear to be optimal for the purpose.
>
> Again, documentation of what can be lost (in terms of configuration and
> features) upon upgrade is missing.


I will clarify in documentation. On live_patch nothing should be lost or 
re-initialized, that's the "live" thing.