[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200729153428.GJ1319041@krava>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:34:28 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Wenbo Zhang <ethercflow@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Brendan Gregg <bgregg@...flix.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 13/13] selftests/bpf: Add set test to
resolve_btfids
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:56:02PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:15 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Adding test to for sets resolve_btfids. We're checking that
> > testing set gets properly resolved and sorted.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c
> > index 101785b49f7e..cc90aa244285 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c
> > @@ -48,6 +48,15 @@ BTF_ID(struct, S)
> > BTF_ID(union, U)
> > BTF_ID(func, func)
> >
> > +BTF_SET_START(test_set)
> > +BTF_ID(typedef, S)
> > +BTF_ID(typedef, T)
> > +BTF_ID(typedef, U)
> > +BTF_ID(struct, S)
> > +BTF_ID(union, U)
> > +BTF_ID(func, func)
> > +BTF_SET_END(test_set)
> > +
> > static int
> > __resolve_symbol(struct btf *btf, int type_id)
> > {
> > @@ -126,5 +135,29 @@ int test_resolve_btfids(void)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + /* Check BTF_SET_START(test_set) IDs */
> > + for (i = 0; i < test_set.cnt && !ret; i++) {
>
> nit: usual we just do `goto err_out;` instead of complicating exit
> condition in a for loop
ok
>
> > + bool found = false;
> > +
> > + for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(test_symbols); j++) {
> > + if (test_symbols[j].id != test_set.ids[i])
> > + continue;
> > + found = true;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = CHECK(!found, "id_check",
> > + "ID %d for %s not found in test_symbols\n",
> > + test_symbols[j].id, test_symbols[j].name);
>
> j == ARRAY_SIZE(test_symbols), you probably meant to get
> test_set.ids[i] instead of test_symbol name/id?
oh yea.. test_set.ids[i] is not found in here
>
> > + if (ret)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + if (i > 0) {
> > + ret = CHECK(test_set.ids[i - 1] > test_set.ids[i],
>
> nit: >= would be the invalid condition
yes, we actualy allow for same IDs to appear in the set
thanks,
jirka
>
> > + "sort_check",
> > + "test_set is not sorted\n");
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > return ret;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.25.4
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists