netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 09/13] devlink: Add enable_remote_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200729135707.5fc65fc8@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:57:07 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 09/13] devlink: Add enable_remote_dev_reset
 generic parameter

On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:42:12 +0300 Moshe Shemesh wrote:
> On 7/28/2020 3:59 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:02:29 +0300 Moshe Shemesh wrote:  
> >> The enable_remote_dev_reset devlink param flags that the host admin
> >> allows device resets that can be initiated by other hosts. This
> >> parameter is useful for setups where a device is shared by different
> >> hosts, such as multi-host setup. Once the user set this parameter to
> >> false, the driver should NACK any attempt to reset the device while the
> >> driver is loaded.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>  
> > There needs to be a devlink event generated when reset is triggered
> > (remotely or not).
> >
> > You're also missing failure reasons. Users need to know if the reset
> > request was clearly nacked by some host, not supported, etc. vs
> > unexpected failure.  
> 
> I will fix and send extack message to the user accordingly.

I'd suggest the reason codes to be somewhat standard.

The groups I can think of:
 - timeout - device did not respond to the reset request
 - device reject - FW or else has nacked the activation req
 - host incapable - one of the participating hosts (in MH) is not
   capable of handling live activation
 - host denied - one of the participating hosts has NACKed
 - host timeout - one of the p. hosts did not ack or done the procedure
   in time (e.g. has not toggled the link)
 - failed reset - the activation itself had failed
 - failed reinit - one of p. hosts was not able to cleanly come back up