netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: expose socket storage to BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200729231735.GD184844@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:17:35 -0700
From:   sdf@...gle.com
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        ast@...nel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: expose socket storage to BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK

On 07/30, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 7/29/20 2:31 AM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
[..]
> sock_addr_func_proto() also lists the BPF_FUNC_sk_storage_delete. Should  
> we add
> that one as well for sock_filter_func_proto()? Presumably create/release  
> doesn't
> make sense, but any use case for bind hook?
Right, I didn't think delete makes sense for create/release, but maybe
it does for post_bind :-/
Let me put it on my list, I'll follow up!