[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzY=P0pL5wwBD=w=02ooueJcg4h8SoeZuC2pz86R3s1wnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 23:16:27 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: don't destroy failed link
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:47 PM Song Liu <song@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:54 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com> wrote:
> >
> > Check that link is NULL or proper pointer before invoking bpf_link__destroy().
> > Not doing this causes crash in test_progs, when cg_storage_multi selftest
> > fails.
> >
> > Cc: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@...gle.com>
> > Fixes: 3573f384014f ("selftests/bpf: Test CGROUP_STORAGE behavior on shared egress + ingress")
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
>
> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
>
> btw: maybe we can move the IS_ERR() check to bpf_link__destroy()?
Yeah, given how common this mistake seems to be, that wouldn't be a bad idea.
>
> > ---
> > .../bpf/prog_tests/cg_storage_multi.c | 42 ++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists