| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <e65f8b84-e6f2-7aa0-4920-db44c63b5efc@dd-wrt.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:21:05 +0200
From: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@...wrt.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: add support for threaded NAPI polling
Am 30.07.2020 um 18:08 schrieb Eric Dumazet:
>
> On 7/30/20 7:30 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
>> Am 29.07.2020 um 19:44 schrieb Eric Dumazet:
>>> On 7/29/20 9:50 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>>> For some drivers (especially 802.11 drivers), doing a lot of work in the NAPI
>>>> poll function does not perform well. Since NAPI poll is bound to the CPU it
>>>> was scheduled from, we can easily end up with a few very busy CPUs spending
>>>> most of their time in softirq/ksoftirqd and some idle ones.
>>>>
>>>> Introduce threaded NAPI for such drivers based on a workqueue. The API is the
>>>> same except for using netif_threaded_napi_add instead of netif_napi_add.
>>>>
>>>> In my tests with mt76 on MT7621 using threaded NAPI + a thread for tx scheduling
>>>> improves LAN->WLAN bridging throughput by 10-50%. Throughput without threaded
>>>> NAPI is wildly inconsistent, depending on the CPU that runs the tx scheduling
>>>> thread.
>>>>
>>>> With threaded NAPI, throughput seems stable and consistent (and higher than
>>>> the best results I got without it).
>>>>
>>>> Based on a patch by Hillf Danton
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes since RFC v2:
>>>> - fix unused but set variable reported by kbuild test robot
>>>>
>>>> Changes since RFC:
>>>> - disable softirq around threaded poll functions
>>>> - reuse most parts of napi_poll()
>>>> - fix re-schedule condition
>>>>
>>>> include/linux/netdevice.h | 23 ++++++
>>>> net/core/dev.c | 162 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>>> 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>> index ac2cd3f49aba..3a39211c7598 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>>> @@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ struct napi_struct {
>>>> struct list_head dev_list;
>>>> struct hlist_node napi_hash_node;
>>>> unsigned int napi_id;
>>>> + struct work_struct work;
>>>> };
>>>> enum {
>>>> @@ -357,6 +358,7 @@ enum {
>>>> NAPI_STATE_HASHED, /* In NAPI hash (busy polling possible) */
>>>> NAPI_STATE_NO_BUSY_POLL,/* Do not add in napi_hash, no busy polling */
>>>> NAPI_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL,/* sk_busy_loop() owns this NAPI */
>>>> + NAPI_STATE_THREADED, /* Use threaded NAPI */
>>>> };
>>>> enum {
>>>> @@ -367,6 +369,7 @@ enum {
>>>> NAPIF_STATE_HASHED = BIT(NAPI_STATE_HASHED),
>>>> NAPIF_STATE_NO_BUSY_POLL = BIT(NAPI_STATE_NO_BUSY_POLL),
>>>> NAPIF_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL = BIT(NAPI_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL),
>>>> + NAPIF_STATE_THREADED = BIT(NAPI_STATE_THREADED),
>>>> };
>>>> enum gro_result {
>>>> @@ -2315,6 +2318,26 @@ static inline void *netdev_priv(const struct net_device *dev)
>>>> void netif_napi_add(struct net_device *dev, struct napi_struct *napi,
>>>> int (*poll)(struct napi_struct *, int), int weight);
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * netif_threaded_napi_add - initialize a NAPI context
>>>> + * @dev: network device
>>>> + * @napi: NAPI context
>>>> + * @poll: polling function
>>>> + * @weight: default weight
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This variant of netif_napi_add() should be used from drivers using NAPI
>>>> + * with CPU intensive poll functions.
>>>> + * This will schedule polling from a high priority workqueue that
>>>> + */
>>>> +static inline void netif_threaded_napi_add(struct net_device *dev,
>>>> + struct napi_struct *napi,
>>>> + int (*poll)(struct napi_struct *, int),
>>>> + int weight)
>>>> +{
>>>> + set_bit(NAPI_STATE_THREADED, &napi->state);
>>>> + netif_napi_add(dev, napi, poll, weight);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> /**
>>>> * netif_tx_napi_add - initialize a NAPI context
>>>> * @dev: network device
>>>> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>>>> index 19f1abc26fcd..11b027f3a2b9 100644
>>>> --- a/net/core/dev.c
>>>> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
>>>> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(offload_lock);
>>>> struct list_head ptype_base[PTYPE_HASH_SIZE] __read_mostly;
>>>> struct list_head ptype_all __read_mostly; /* Taps */
>>>> static struct list_head offload_base __read_mostly;
>>>> +static struct workqueue_struct *napi_workq __read_mostly;
>>>> static int netif_rx_internal(struct sk_buff *skb);
>>>> static int call_netdevice_notifiers_info(unsigned long val,
>>>> @@ -6286,6 +6287,11 @@ void __napi_schedule(struct napi_struct *n)
>>>> {
>>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>> + if (test_bit(NAPI_STATE_THREADED, &n->state)) {
>>>> + queue_work(napi_workq, &n->work);
>>>> + return;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>> Where is the corresponding cancel_work_sync() or flush_work() at device dismantle ?
>>>
>>> Just hoping the thread will eventually run seems optimistic to me.
>>>
>>>
>>> Quite frankly, I do believe this STATE_THREADED status should be a generic NAPI attribute
>>> that can be changed dynamically, at admin request, instead of having to change/recompile
>>> a driver.
>> thats not that easy. wifi devices do use dummy netdev devices. they are not visible to sysfs and other administrative options.
>> so changing it would just be possible if a special mac80211 based control would be implemented for these drivers.
>> for standard netdev devices it isnt a big thing to implement a administrative control by sysfs (if you are talking about such a feature)
> We do not want to add code in fast path only for one device. We need something truly generic.
>
> I am not saying only the admin can chose, it is fine if a driver does not give the choice
> and will simply call netif_threaded_napi_add()
what could make sense if the feature can be disabled / enabled, but it
will only affect drivers using the netif_threaded_napi_add call, but it
should not affect drivers
using the old api in any way since not all drivers will work with this
feature.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists