[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94cacb22-c31d-4cd3-3872-2e431bafb0da@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:40:15 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] mscc: Add LCPLL Reset to VSC8574 Family of
phy drivers
On 7/30/20 4:36 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Bryan Whitehead <Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com>
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:18:28 -0400
>
>> @@ -929,6 +929,77 @@ static bool vsc8574_is_serdes_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> }
>>
>> /* bus->mdio_lock should be locked when using this function */
>> +/* Page should already be set to MSCC_PHY_PAGE_EXTENDED_GPIO */
>> +static int vsc8574_micro_command(struct phy_device *phydev, u16 command)
> ...
>> +/* bus->mdio_lock should be locked when using this function */
>
> Please don't dup this comment, it's not appropriate.
Agree put a mutex assertion instead if you want to catch offenders at
run time?
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists