[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200802221020.GN24045@ziepe.ca>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 19:10:20 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
rds-devel@....oracle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH net] rds: Prevent kernel-infoleak
in rds_notify_queue_get()
On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 08:38:33AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> I'm using {} instead of {0} because of this GCC bug.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53119
This is why the {} extension exists..
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists