[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200803182631.GA28007@hoboy>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 11:26:31 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, f.fainelli@...il.com,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: sja1105: poll for extts events from a
timer
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 08:51:58PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> The current poll interval is enough to ensure that rising and falling
> edge events are not lost for a 1 PPS signal with 50% duty cycle.
> Fix that by taking the following measures:
> - Schedule the poll from a timer. Because we are really scheduling the
> timer periodically, the extts events delivered to user space are
> periodic too, and don't suffer from the "shift-to-the-right" effect.
> - Increase the poll period to 6 times a second. This imposes a smaller
> upper bound to the shift that can occur to the delivery time of extts
> events, and makes user space (ts2phc) to always interpret correctly
> which events should be skipped and which shouldn't.
> - Move the SPI readout itself to the main PTP kernel thread, instead of
> the generic workqueue. This is because the timer runs in atomic
> context, but is also better than before, because if needed, we can
> chrt & taskset this kernel thread, to ensure it gets enough priority
> under load.
Makes sense to me.
Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists