netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] Support PMTU discovery with bridged UDP tunnels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:46:42 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>,
        Numan Siddique <nusiddiq@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Lourdes Pedrajas <lu@...o.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] Support PMTU discovery with bridged UDP
 tunnels

On 8/3/20 5:28 PM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Currently, PMTU discovery for UDP tunnels only works if packets are
>> routed to the encapsulating interfaces, not bridged.
>>
>> This results from the fact that we generally don't have valid routes
>> to the senders we can use to relay ICMP and ICMPv6 errors, and makes
>> PMTU discovery completely non-functional for VXLAN and GENEVE ports of
>> both regular bridges and Open vSwitch instances.
>>
>> If the sender is local, and packets are forwarded to the port by a
>> regular bridge, all it takes is to generate a corresponding route
>> exception on the encapsulating device. The bridge then finds the route
>> exception carrying the PMTU value estimate as it forwards frames, and
>> relays ICMP messages back to the socket of the local sender. Patch 1/6
>> fixes this case.
>>
>> If the sender resides on another node, we actually need to reply to
>> IP and IPv6 packets ourselves and send these ICMP or ICMPv6 errors
>> back, using the same encapsulating device. Patch 2/6, based on an
>> original idea by Florian Westphal, adds the needed functionality,
>> while patches 3/6 and 4/6 add matching support for VXLAN and GENEVE.
>>
>> Finally, 5/6 and 6/6 introduce selftests for all combinations of
>> inner and outer IP versions, covering both VXLAN and GENEVE, with
>> both regular bridges and Open vSwitch instances.
> 
> Thanks for taking over and brining this into shape, this looks good to
> me.

+1. I'm sure this took quite a bit of your time. Thanks for doing that.
I like this version much better.