[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r1sncavb.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 07:07:20 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next-2020-08-02
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
> Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 19:01:36 +0000 (UTC)
>
>> here's a pull request to net-next tree, more info below. Please let me know if
>> there are any problems.
>
> There are many several non-trivial mt76 conflicts, can you please sort
> this out and send me another pull request?
Yeah, I noticed the same and I tried to explain how to fix those in the
signed tag:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This pull request causes conflicts in four files in
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7615/, here is how I fixed those:
* usb.c: take the hunk which uses mt7663_usb_sdio_tx_*() functions
* mt7615.h: remove either one of the duplicate (and identical) enum tx_pkt_queue_idx
* mt7615.h: take the hunk which has mt7615_mutex_acquire/release() functions
* main.c: take the hunk which uses mt7615_mutex_acquire/release()
* mac.c: take the hunk which uses is_mmio
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By following those instructions it shouldn't take more than few minutes
to fix the conflicts.
Or would you prefer that I fix those differently, for example by pulling
net-next to wireless-drivers-next before I send the pull request? Just
let me know what you prefer.
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists