[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9809b6b99bf5ba2dc8d1440c7d4fc93d04a7504a.1596524550.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 15:02:30 +0800
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, dnelson@...hat.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...ium.com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 net] net: thunderx: use spin_lock_bh in nicvf_set_rx_mode_task()
A dead lock was triggered on thunderx driver:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
[01] lock(&(&nic->rx_mode_wq_lock)->rlock);
[11] lock(&(&mc->mca_lock)->rlock);
[12] lock(&(&nic->rx_mode_wq_lock)->rlock);
[02] <Interrupt> lock(&(&mc->mca_lock)->rlock);
The path for each is:
[01] worker_thread() -> process_one_work() -> nicvf_set_rx_mode_task()
[02] mld_ifc_timer_expire()
[11] ipv6_add_dev() -> ipv6_dev_mc_inc() -> igmp6_group_added() ->
[12] dev_mc_add() -> __dev_set_rx_mode() -> nicvf_set_rx_mode()
To fix it, it needs to disable bh on [1], so that the timer on [2]
wouldn't be triggered until rx_mode_wq_lock is released. So change
to use spin_lock_bh() instead of spin_lock().
Thanks to Paolo for helping with this.
v1->v2:
- post to netdev.
Reported-by: Rafael P. <rparrazo@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Dean Nelson <dnelson@...hat.com>
Fixes: 469998c861fa ("net: thunderx: prevent concurrent data re-writing by nicvf_set_rx_mode")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c
index 2ba0ce1..a82c708 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c
@@ -2042,11 +2042,11 @@ static void nicvf_set_rx_mode_task(struct work_struct *work_arg)
/* Save message data locally to prevent them from
* being overwritten by next ndo_set_rx_mode call().
*/
- spin_lock(&nic->rx_mode_wq_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&nic->rx_mode_wq_lock);
mode = vf_work->mode;
mc = vf_work->mc;
vf_work->mc = NULL;
- spin_unlock(&nic->rx_mode_wq_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&nic->rx_mode_wq_lock);
__nicvf_set_rx_mode_task(mode, mc, nic);
}
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists