lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 5 Aug 2020 07:53:41 -0400
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
Cc:     jasowang@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, eli@...lanox.com,
        shahafs@...lanox.com, parav@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost_vdpa: unified set_vq_irq() and update_vq_irq()

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 07:38:32PM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> This commit merge vhost_vdpa_update_vq_irq() logics into
> vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(), so that code are unified.
> 
> In vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(), added checks for the existence
> for get_vq_irq().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>

which commit should I squash this into?

commit f8e695e9dbd88464bc3d1f01769229dedf8f30d6
Author: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
Date:   Fri Jul 31 14:55:31 2020 +0800

    vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa
    

this one?

> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 28 ++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> index 26f166a8192e..044e1f54582a 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> @@ -122,8 +122,12 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid)
>  	struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
>  	int ret, irq;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> +	if (!ops->get_vq_irq)
> +		return;
> +
>  	irq = ops->get_vq_irq(vdpa, qid);
> +	spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> +	irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
>  	if (!vq->call_ctx.ctx || irq < 0) {
>  		spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
>  		return;
> @@ -144,26 +148,6 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_unsetup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid)
>  	spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
>  }
>  
> -static void vhost_vdpa_update_vq_irq(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> -{
> -	spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> -	/*
> -	 * if it has a non-zero irq, means there is a
> -	 * previsouly registered irq_bypass_producer,
> -	 * we should update it when ctx (its token)
> -	 * changes.
> -	 */
> -	if (!vq->call_ctx.producer.irq) {
> -		spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
> -	irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
> -	vq->call_ctx.producer.token = vq->call_ctx.ctx;
> -	irq_bypass_register_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
> -	spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> -}
> -
>  static void vhost_vdpa_reset(struct vhost_vdpa *v)
>  {
>  	struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
> @@ -452,7 +436,7 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_vring_ioctl(struct vhost_vdpa *v, unsigned int cmd,
>  			cb.private = NULL;
>  		}
>  		ops->set_vq_cb(vdpa, idx, &cb);
> -		vhost_vdpa_update_vq_irq(vq);
> +		vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(v, idx);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case VHOST_SET_VRING_NUM:
> -- 
> 2.18.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists