lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 06 Aug 2020 08:41:50 +0200
From:   Rouven Czerwinski <r.czerwinski@...gutronix.de>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     borisp@...lanox.com, aviadye@...lanox.com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: tls: add compat for get/setsockopt

On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 17:45 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> Neither of these patches apply cleanly to net-next.  The compat handling
> and TLS code has been changed quite a bit lately.

Indeed, Patch 1 is no longer required on net-next. I'll drop the patch.

> ALso, you must provide a proper header "[PATCH 0/N] ..." posting for your
> patch series which explains at a high level what your patch series is doing,
> how it is doing it, and why it is doing it that way.

Since I'm now down to one patch I'll forgo the cover letter and expand
the commit message.

Thanks for the explanation,
Rouven

Powered by blists - more mailing lists