[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzbQTg7ct0+JpSFY2rQ4H8j6vScb0z_wJ-PeFqDzS=aE7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 10:49:59 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] Add generic and raw BTF parsing APIs to libbpf
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:39 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<arnaldo.melo@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Em Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 06:32:16PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko escreveu:
> > It's pretty common for applications to want to parse raw (binary) BTF data
> > from file, as opposed to parsing it from ELF sections. It's also pretty common
> > for tools to not care whether given file is ELF or raw BTF format. This patch
> > series exposes internal raw BTF parsing API and adds generic variant of BTF
> > parsing, which will efficiently determine the format of a given fail and will
> > parse BTF appropriately.
> >
> > Patches #2 and #3 removes re-implementations of such APIs from bpftool and
> > resolve_btfids tools.
> >
> > Andrii Nakryiko (3):
> > libbpf: add btf__parse_raw() and generic btf__parse() APIs
> > tools/bpftool: use libbpf's btf__parse() API for parsing BTF from file
> > tools/resolve_btfids: use libbpf's btf__parse() API
>
> I haven't checked which of the patches, or some in other series caused
> this on Clear Linux:
>
> 21 clearlinux:latest : FAIL gcc (Clear Linux OS for Intel Architecture) 10.2.1 20200723 releases/gcc-10.2.0-3-g677b80db41, clang ver
> sion 10.0.1
>
> gcc (Clear Linux OS for Intel Architecture) 10.2.1 20200723 releases/gcc-10.2.0-3-g677b80db41
>
> btf.c: In function 'btf__parse_raw':
> btf.c:625:28: error: 'btf' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> 625 | return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : btf;
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
>
Yeah, fixed in https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200805223359.32109-1-danieltimlee@gmail.com/
> This is what I have:
>
> [acme@...co perf]$ git log -10 --oneline tools/lib/bpf
> 94a1fedd63ed libbpf: Add btf__parse_raw() and generic btf__parse() APIs
> 2e49527e5248 libbpf: Add bpf_link detach APIs
> 1acf8f90ea7e libbpf: Fix register in PT_REGS MIPS macros
> 50450fc716c1 libbpf: Make destructors more robust by handling ERR_PTR(err) cases
> dc8698cac7aa libbpf: Add support for BPF XDP link
> d4b4dd6ce770 libbpf: Print hint when PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF returns -EPROTO
> cd31039a7347 tools/libbpf: Add support for bpf map element iterator
> da7a35062bcc libbpf bpf_helpers: Use __builtin_offsetof for offsetof
> 499dd29d90bb libbpf: Add support for SK_LOOKUP program type
> 4be556cf5aef libbpf: Add SEC name for xdp programs attached to CPUMAP
> [acme@...co perf]$
>
> > tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c | 54 +------------
> > tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/.gitignore | 4 +
> > tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c | 58 +-------------
> > tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++---------
> > tools/lib/bpf/btf.h | 5 +-
> > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 2 +
> > 6 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/.gitignore
> >
> > --
> > 2.24.1
> >
>
> --
>
> - Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists