netdev - [RFC PATCH v11 bpf-next 02/14] tools resolve_btfids: Add support for set symbols

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200809150302.686149-3-jolsa@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun,  9 Aug 2020 17:02:50 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Wenbo Zhang <ethercflow@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Brendan Gregg <bgregg@...flix.com>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v11 bpf-next 02/14] tools resolve_btfids: Add support for set symbols

The set symbol does not have the unique number suffix,
so we need to give it a special parsing function.

This was omitted in the first batch, because there was
no set support yet, so it slipped in the testing.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
---
 tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c b/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c
index b83369887df6..81782c3ff485 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c
@@ -227,6 +227,24 @@ static char *get_id(const char *prefix_end)
 	return id;
 }
 
+static struct btf_id *add_set(struct object *obj, char *name)
+{
+	/*
+	 * __BTF_ID__set__name
+	 * name =    ^
+	 * id   =         ^
+	 */
+	char *id = name + sizeof(BTF_SET "__") - 1;
+	int len = strlen(name);
+
+	if (id >= name + len) {
+		pr_err("FAILED to parse set name: %s\n", name);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	return btf_id__add(&obj->sets, id, true);
+}
+
 static struct btf_id *add_symbol(struct rb_root *root, char *name, size_t size)
 {
 	char *id;
@@ -383,7 +401,7 @@ static int symbols_collect(struct object *obj)
 			id = add_symbol(&obj->funcs, prefix, sizeof(BTF_FUNC) - 1);
 		/* set */
 		} else if (!strncmp(prefix, BTF_SET, sizeof(BTF_SET) - 1)) {
-			id = add_symbol(&obj->sets, prefix, sizeof(BTF_SET) - 1);
+			id = add_set(obj, prefix);
 			/*
 			 * SET objects store list's count, which is encoded
 			 * in symbol's size, together with 'cnt' field hence
-- 
2.25.4