lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159718353345.4728.8805043614257933227.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower>
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2020 15:05:33 -0700
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     songliubraving@...com, kafai@...com, daniel@...earbox.net,
        ast@...nel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        john.fastabend@...il.com
Subject: [bpf PATCH v3 4/5] bpf,
 selftests: Add tests for sock_ops load with r9, r8.r7 registers

Loads in sock_ops case when using high registers requires extra logic to
ensure the correct temporary value is used. We need to ensure the temp
register does not use either the src_reg or dst_reg. Lets add an asm
test to force the logic is triggered.

The xlated code is here,

  30: (7b) *(u64 *)(r9 +32) = r7
  31: (61) r7 = *(u32 *)(r9 +28)
  32: (15) if r7 == 0x0 goto pc+2
  33: (79) r7 = *(u64 *)(r9 +0)
  34: (63) *(u32 *)(r7 +916) = r8
  35: (79) r7 = *(u64 *)(r9 +32)

Notice r9 and r8 are not used for temp registers and r7 is chosen.

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c |    7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c
index f8b13682..6420b61 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c
@@ -75,6 +75,13 @@ int bpf_testcb(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops)
 		: [skops] "r"(skops)
 		:);
 
+	asm volatile (
+		"r9 = %[skops];\n"
+		"r8 = *(u32 *)(r9 +164);\n"
+		"*(u32 *)(r9 +164) = r8;\n"
+		:: [skops] "r"(skops)
+		: "r9", "r8");
+
 	op = (int) skops->op;
 
 	update_event_map(op);

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ