netdev - [PATCH bpf 9/9] selftests/bpf: make test_varlen work with 32-bit user-space arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200813071722.2213397-10-andriin@fb.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:17:22 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...com>,
        <daniel@...earbox.net>
CC:     <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 9/9] selftests/bpf: make test_varlen work with 32-bit user-space arch

Despite bpftool generating data section memory layout that will work for
32-bit architectures on user-space side, BPF programs should be careful to not
use ambiguous types like `long`, which have different size in 32-bit and
64-bit environments. Fix that in test by using __u64 explicitly, which is
a recommended approach anyway.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/varlen.c | 8 ++++----
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_varlen.c | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/varlen.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/varlen.c
index c75525eab02c..dd324b4933db 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/varlen.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/varlen.c
@@ -44,25 +44,25 @@ void test_varlen(void)
 	CHECK_VAL(bss->payload1_len2, size2);
 	CHECK_VAL(bss->total1, size1 + size2);
 	CHECK(memcmp(bss->payload1, exp_str, size1 + size2), "content_check",
-	      "doesn't match!");
+	      "doesn't match!\n");
 
 	CHECK_VAL(data->payload2_len1, size1);
 	CHECK_VAL(data->payload2_len2, size2);
 	CHECK_VAL(data->total2, size1 + size2);
 	CHECK(memcmp(data->payload2, exp_str, size1 + size2), "content_check",
-	      "doesn't match!");
+	      "doesn't match!\n");
 
 	CHECK_VAL(data->payload3_len1, size1);
 	CHECK_VAL(data->payload3_len2, size2);
 	CHECK_VAL(data->total3, size1 + size2);
 	CHECK(memcmp(data->payload3, exp_str, size1 + size2), "content_check",
-	      "doesn't match!");
+	      "doesn't match!\n");
 
 	CHECK_VAL(data->payload4_len1, size1);
 	CHECK_VAL(data->payload4_len2, size2);
 	CHECK_VAL(data->total4, size1 + size2);
 	CHECK(memcmp(data->payload4, exp_str, size1 + size2), "content_check",
-	      "doesn't match!");
+	      "doesn't match!\n");
 cleanup:
 	test_varlen__destroy(skel);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_varlen.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_varlen.c
index cd4b72c55dfe..913acdffd90f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_varlen.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_varlen.c
@@ -15,9 +15,9 @@ int test_pid = 0;
 bool capture = false;
 
 /* .bss */
-long payload1_len1 = 0;
-long payload1_len2 = 0;
-long total1 = 0;
+__u64 payload1_len1 = 0;
+__u64 payload1_len2 = 0;
+__u64 total1 = 0;
 char payload1[MAX_LEN + MAX_LEN] = {};
 
 /* .data */
-- 
2.24.1