netdev - Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKR_QVLYeY5g8kuGwCPBj+aRMmE_yAUYx593vW1-UGYZGZnH3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Aug 2020 18:40:32 +0200
From:   Tom Psyborg <pozega.tomislav@...il.com>
To:     Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc:     kvalo@...eaurora.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return

On 14/08/2020, Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com> wrote:
> In the function ath10k_ahb_clock_init(), devm_clk_get() doesn't
> return NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() to validate
> the returned value instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> index ed87bc00f..ea669af6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> @@ -87,24 +87,24 @@ static int ath10k_ahb_clock_init(struct ath10k *ar)
>  	dev = &ar_ahb->pdev->dev;
>
>  	ar_ahb->cmd_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_cmd");
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
> +	if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
>  		ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get cmd clk: %ld\n",
>  			   PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk));
> -		return ar_ahb->cmd_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk) : -ENODEV;
> +		return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk);
>  	}
>
>  	ar_ahb->ref_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_ref");
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->ref_clk)) {
> +	if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk)) {
>  		ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get ref clk: %ld\n",
>  			   PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk));
> -		return ar_ahb->ref_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk) : -ENODEV;
> +		return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk);
>  	}
>
>  	ar_ahb->rtc_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_rtc");
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->rtc_clk)) {
> +	if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk)) {
>  		ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get rtc clk: %ld\n",
>  			   PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk));
> -		return ar_ahb->rtc_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk) : -ENODEV;
> +		return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk);
>  	}
>
>  	return 0;
> --
> 2.20.1.windows.1
>
>
>
>

Hi

You should've include which HW/FW combination you tested this on