[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200814.204534.1768395928757280237.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 20:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc: maximmi@...lanox.com, mkubecek@...e.cz, andrew@...n.ch,
kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] ethtool-netlink bug fixes
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 07:58:29 -0700
>
>
> On 8/14/2020 6:16 AM, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
>> This series contains a few bug fixes for ethtool-netlink. These bugs
>> are
>> specific for the netlink interface, and the legacy ioctl interface is
>> not affected. These patches aim to have the same behavior in
>> ethtool-netlink as in the legacy ethtool.
>> Please also see the sibling series for the userspace tool.
>
> Since you are targeting the net tree, should not those changes also
> have corresponding Fixes tag?
Yes, they definitely should.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists