[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200816.211002.1955628031429504263.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 21:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: linus.luessing@...3.blue
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
gluon@...beck.freifunk.net, openwrt-devel@...ts.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] bridge: Implement MLD Querier wake-up
calls / Android bug workaround
From: Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@...3.blue>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 22:24:24 +0200
> I'm aware that this is quite a hack, so I'm unsure if this is suitable
> for upstream. On the other hand, the Android ticket isn't moving
> anywhere and even if it were fixed in Android, I'd expect it to take
> years until that fix would propagate or unpatched Android devices to
> vanish. So I'm wondering if it should be treated like a hardware bug
> workaround and by that should be suitable for applying it upstream in
> the Linux kernel?
Long after those Android devices are deprecated and no longer used, we
will still have this ugly hack in the tree.
Sorry, we're not doing this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists