lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:35:38 +0200
From:   Bjørn Mork <>
To:     Sven Eckelmann <>
        Linus Lüssing <>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <>,, Roopa Prabhu <>,,,
        "David S . Miller" <>
Subject: Re: [gluon] Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] bridge: Implement MLD Querier wake-up calls / Android bug workaround

Sven Eckelmann <> writes:
> On Monday, 17 August 2020 10:39:00 CEST Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> Linus Lüssing <> writes:
> [...]
>> This is not a bug.  They are deliberately breaking IPv6 because they
>> consider this a feature.  You should not try to work around such issues.
>> It is a fight you cannot win.  Any workaround will only encourage them
>> to come up with new ways to break IPv6.
> Who are "they" and


> where is this information coming from?

I made it up.

> And what do they gain from breaking IPv6?

Battery time.

> Wouldn't it be easier for them just to disable IPv6 
> than adding random looking bugs?

You would think so.

If it isn't clear, I am hoping to provoke them to re-classify the
"feature" as a bug and fix it.  That's what it takes to prove I am wrong.
Should be easy-peasy.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists