[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200817142952.GC2291654@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:29:52 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
jiri@...dia.com, amcohen@...dia.com, danieller@...dia.com,
mlxsw@...dia.com, roopa@...dia.com, dsahern@...il.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
tariqt@...dia.com, ayal@...dia.com, eranbe@...dia.com,
mkubecek@...e.cz, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 6/6] mlxsw: spectrum_nve: Expose VXLAN
counters via devlink-metric
> +static int mlxsw_sp1_nve_vxlan_metrics_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
> +{
> + struct mlxsw_sp_nve_metrics *metrics = &mlxsw_sp->nve->metrics;
> + struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(mlxsw_sp->core);
> + int err;
> +
> + err = mlxsw_sp1_nve_vxlan_counters_clear(mlxsw_sp);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + metrics->counter_encap =
> + devlink_metric_counter_create(devlink, "nve_vxlan_encap",
> + &mlxsw_sp1_nve_vxlan_encap_ops,
> + mlxsw_sp);
> + if (IS_ERR(metrics->counter_encap))
> + return PTR_ERR(metrics->counter_encap);
> +
> + metrics->counter_decap =
> + devlink_metric_counter_create(devlink, "nve_vxlan_decap",
> + &mlxsw_sp1_nve_vxlan_decap_ops,
> + mlxsw_sp);
> + if (IS_ERR(metrics->counter_decap)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(metrics->counter_decap);
> + goto err_counter_decap;
> + }
> +
> + metrics->counter_decap_errors =
> + devlink_metric_counter_create(devlink, "nve_vxlan_decap_errors",
> + &mlxsw_sp1_nve_vxlan_decap_errors_ops,
> + mlxsw_sp);
> + if (IS_ERR(metrics->counter_decap_errors)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(metrics->counter_decap_errors);
> + goto err_counter_decap_errors;
> + }
> +
> + metrics->counter_decap_discards =
> + devlink_metric_counter_create(devlink, "nve_vxlan_decap_discards",
> + &mlxsw_sp1_nve_vxlan_decap_discards_ops,
> + mlxsw_sp);
> + if (IS_ERR(metrics->counter_decap_discards)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(metrics->counter_decap_discards);
> + goto err_counter_decap_discards;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
Looking at this, i wonder about the scalability of this API. With just
4 counters it looks pretty ugly. What about 50 counters?
Maybe move the name into the ops structure. Then add a call
devlink_metric_counters_create() where you can pass an array and array
size of op structures? There are plenty of other examples in the
kernel, e.g. sysfs groups, hwmon, etc. where you register a large
bunch of things with the core with a single call.
> +static void mlxsw_sp1_nve_vxlan_metrics_fini(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
> +{
> + struct mlxsw_sp_nve_metrics *metrics = &mlxsw_sp->nve->metrics;
> + struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(mlxsw_sp->core);
> +
> + devlink_metric_destroy(devlink, metrics->counter_decap_discards);
> + devlink_metric_destroy(devlink, metrics->counter_decap_errors);
> + devlink_metric_destroy(devlink, metrics->counter_decap);
> + devlink_metric_destroy(devlink, metrics->counter_encap);
> +}
I guess the most frequent use case is to remove all counters,
e.g. driver unload, or when probe fails. So maybe provide a
devlink_metric_destroy_all(devlink) ?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists