[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f46edd0e-f44c-e600-2026-2d2ca960a94b@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:49:09 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>,
Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tipc: not enable tipc when ipv6 works as a module
On 8/17/20 11:31 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 11:37 PM Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 2:29 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Or put it into struct ipv6_stub?
>> Hi Cong,
>>
>> That could be one way. We may do it when this new function becomes more common.
>> By now, I think it's okay to make TIPC depend on IPV6 || IPV6=n.
>
> I am not a fan of IPV6=m, but disallowing it for one symbol seems
> too harsh.
Hi,
Maybe I'm not following you, but this doesn't disallow IPV6=m.
It just restricts how TIPC can be built, so that
TIPC=y and IPV6=m cannot happen together, which causes
a build error.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists